Twitter icon

Facebook icon

About us
Our beliefs
Is this your first visit?
Contact us
External links

Recommended books

Visitors' essays
Our forum
New essays
Other features
Vital notes

World religions
Christian def'n
Climate Change
 Shared beliefs
 Handling change
 Bible topics
 Bible inerrancy
 Bible harmony
 Interpret the Bible
 Beliefs & creeds
 Da Vinci code
 Revelation 666
Other religions
Cults and NRMs
Comparing Religions

Non-theistic beliefs

About all religions
Main topics
Basic information
Gods & Goddesses
Handling change
Doubt & security
Confusing terms
End of the World?
True religion?
Seasonal events
Science vs. Religion
More information

Morality & ethics
Absolute truth

Attaining peace
Religious tolerance
Religious freedom
Religious hatred
Religious conflict
Religious violence

"Hot" topics
Very hot topics
Ten Commandments
Abortion access
Assisted suicide
Death penalty

Same-sex marriage

Human rights
Gays in the military
Sex & gender
Stem cells
Other topics

Laws and news
Religious laws
Religious news



Religious Tolerance logo


An article by Contributing Editor Susan Humphreys:

"Here We Go Again:" A novel
interpretation of church-state
separation, and what to do about it:

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

An article on the AlterNet website, reports that Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch says "no American can challenge a Christian religious display on government property." 1

Possibly the reason for this is that "He claims that because 'their only injury is that they take offense'." And I surmise that being "offended" isn’t enough to warrant a legal challenge.

Another possible bit of reasoning is that a simple display is not establishing a state religion.

I think Justice Gorsuch should reconsider his arguments because what is good for the gander can also be good for the goose! Or to put it another way -- two can play at this game!

Secularists, Atheists and Humanists need to act smarter, less confrontational. They simply need to devise their own plaque or a monument to place on government property.

I envision a monument containing the Code of Hamurabi, the code of Ashoka the Great, and the Ten Commandments. This could be in the form of a three sided obelisk, or with the three codes on a single monument, or three monuments side-by-side.

IF Christians really aren’t trying to promote Christianity and IF Justice Gorsuch reasoning holds -- being offended isn’t justification for objecting to a monument. IF, as I surmise, he also claims that such a monument isn’t promoting religion, then there can be no objection to the monument or plaque that I suggest.

My second suggestion is a Peace Obelisk that is covered with symbols from many different religions (past and present) and secular philosophies. It could include:

  • a double helix, Pi, or the atomic symbol to represent science.
  • mathematical symbols such as the one for infinity.
  • the Greek letters for Alpha and Omega,
  • the Chinese symbol for earth or heaven and/or Tao,
  • the Buddhist symbol of a wheel surrounded by flames,
  • an Aladdin style or old Hebrew style oil lamp,
  • a Big Bear and a spiral sun disc,
  • a Zia sun symbol,
  • a Six sided star,
  • an upside down cross,
  • the Egyptian cross,
  • a swastika,
  • etc.

A google search for religious symbols turns up plenty of examples to choose from. The Religious Symbols web site lists a bunch.

horizontal rule

Sponsored link:

horizontal rule

One man in the online discussion of the AlterNet article suggested adding a Dollar Sign!

This Peace Obelisk doesn’t promote any religion or secular philosophy. It simply acknowledges the great diversity of ideas and ideals that have influenced human societies.

A third suggestion is a plaque or monument with the many different wordings from many different religions and cultures of the Golden Rule showing how this simple teaching has been common across many cultures. The world would be in a whole lot better place if people actually practiced this one simple teaching!

One expression of the rule is: "Do not do to others what you would take unkindly from them"!

horizontal rule

References used:

The following information sources were used to prepare and update the above essay. The hyperlinks are not necessarily still active today.

  1. "something Rmuse," "Justice Neil Gorsuch says no-one can sue to stop the government from establishing religion," 2019-MAR-28, at:

horizontal rule

How you may have arrived here:

 Home > Religion & law >Church-state separation> here

Home pageVisitors' essays > here

Home pageWebsite featuresVisitors' essays > here

horizontal rule

Original posting: 2019-APR-08
Author: Contributing Editor Susan Humphreys
line.gif (538 bytes)
Sponsored link

Go to the previous page, or go to the "separation of church and state issues" menu, or to the visitors' essays menu, or choose:

Go to home page  We would really appreciate your help

E-mail us about errors, etc.  Hot, controversial topics

FreeFind search, lists of new essays...  Having problems printing our essays?

Twitter link

Facebook icon

Google Page Translator:

This page translator works on Firefox,
Opera, Chrome, and Safari browsers only

After translating, click on the "show
original" button at the top of this
page to restore page to English.

Sponsored links